Unregulated Capitalism
• Meaning:-
At first glance unregulated, or unfettered, or unrestrained capitalism seems to mean a market where there are either no rules, or no enforcement of the rules. But this cannot actually occur. At your local farmer's market, to use the simplest example, there are sellers, buyers, and product/produce. But there must be something else. If you pay for an apple but don't get an apple, you haven't made a market transaction; you've been robbed. If you take an apple without paying for it, likewise, something other than capitalism is going on.
• Discussion:-
A market cannot come into being without rules and the hope of impartial application of those rules. That's going to require a third party with authority respected by both buyers and sellers. That begins to look like a government. Government's role is to enforce contracts and to prevent bad neighbour hood effects. No farmer is intentionally going to deliver the fruit of his labour’s to the thief; no buyer will walk into a dark alley wearing a sign reading, "Rob Me." Without rules and the credible threat of harm against those who break them, the marketplace will remain a vacant lot.
Yes, the government also provides the means of exchange (money) for the transaction. But the market could exist using barter or bitcoin or any other kind of agreed-upon payment. And it's true that the government builds the roads by which the farmer and the shopper get to the market. But it's a myth that only government can build roads. People were making roads on this continent – bridges, too – long before government got into the act. Today the best roads are privately owned roads.
But there's another possible meaning of "unregulated capitalism," and that is that not every transaction in the market has been approved by the powerful. Remember that justice has nothing to do with "all men" and how we are created; justice to them is something that goes "from each," "to each," according to the Committee's will. What is really unregulated, unbounded and unchecked is the left's willingness to use the violent means of government to achieve whatever result they want.
Under this definition of "unregulated capitalism," it's something that happens whenever people buy and sell outside the leftist's favour and observation, no matter how many rules are on the books. He, from his throne, must not only set the price of the apple, but also specify how it shall and shall not be grown, how it shall and shall not be transported, and the hours and working conditions of the farmer. He will also determine every detail of the life and decision-making process of the buyer. I suppose this would be, in his mind, "regulated capitalism." Of course this is not capitalism at all, but totalitarianism.
Surely "unregulated" means either "without laws" or "without the particular (illegal) bureaucratic commands that we call regulations. "Unregulated" must mean something different than "properly regulated." If the leftist were to use that term, he'd be obliged to define "properly," and to use logical arguments to defend his proposals for proper regulations. But if he had wished to engage in rational debate, he wouldn't have felt the need to create a bogeyman in the first place.
• Conclusion:-
I have concluded from the above that the unregulated capitalism is that which is without any rules this will lead to taking place of unethical things like unfair trade, creating false demand, etc means if there is no bureaucrats then this will lead to exploitation of customers and lead to a sharp fall in market demand. In this individual only focus on its profit by selling their product in market, but the profit is not only the things they should have to earn goodwill in market.
SUBMITTED TO:- SUBMITTED BY:-
PROF.GURDEEPAK SINGH. AKASHDEEP SINGH RIAT
MBA-1
• Meaning:-
At first glance unregulated, or unfettered, or unrestrained capitalism seems to mean a market where there are either no rules, or no enforcement of the rules. But this cannot actually occur. At your local farmer's market, to use the simplest example, there are sellers, buyers, and product/produce. But there must be something else. If you pay for an apple but don't get an apple, you haven't made a market transaction; you've been robbed. If you take an apple without paying for it, likewise, something other than capitalism is going on.
• Discussion:-
A market cannot come into being without rules and the hope of impartial application of those rules. That's going to require a third party with authority respected by both buyers and sellers. That begins to look like a government. Government's role is to enforce contracts and to prevent bad neighbour hood effects. No farmer is intentionally going to deliver the fruit of his labour’s to the thief; no buyer will walk into a dark alley wearing a sign reading, "Rob Me." Without rules and the credible threat of harm against those who break them, the marketplace will remain a vacant lot.
Yes, the government also provides the means of exchange (money) for the transaction. But the market could exist using barter or bitcoin or any other kind of agreed-upon payment. And it's true that the government builds the roads by which the farmer and the shopper get to the market. But it's a myth that only government can build roads. People were making roads on this continent – bridges, too – long before government got into the act. Today the best roads are privately owned roads.
But there's another possible meaning of "unregulated capitalism," and that is that not every transaction in the market has been approved by the powerful. Remember that justice has nothing to do with "all men" and how we are created; justice to them is something that goes "from each," "to each," according to the Committee's will. What is really unregulated, unbounded and unchecked is the left's willingness to use the violent means of government to achieve whatever result they want.
Under this definition of "unregulated capitalism," it's something that happens whenever people buy and sell outside the leftist's favour and observation, no matter how many rules are on the books. He, from his throne, must not only set the price of the apple, but also specify how it shall and shall not be grown, how it shall and shall not be transported, and the hours and working conditions of the farmer. He will also determine every detail of the life and decision-making process of the buyer. I suppose this would be, in his mind, "regulated capitalism." Of course this is not capitalism at all, but totalitarianism.
Surely "unregulated" means either "without laws" or "without the particular (illegal) bureaucratic commands that we call regulations. "Unregulated" must mean something different than "properly regulated." If the leftist were to use that term, he'd be obliged to define "properly," and to use logical arguments to defend his proposals for proper regulations. But if he had wished to engage in rational debate, he wouldn't have felt the need to create a bogeyman in the first place.
• Conclusion:-
I have concluded from the above that the unregulated capitalism is that which is without any rules this will lead to taking place of unethical things like unfair trade, creating false demand, etc means if there is no bureaucrats then this will lead to exploitation of customers and lead to a sharp fall in market demand. In this individual only focus on its profit by selling their product in market, but the profit is not only the things they should have to earn goodwill in market.
SUBMITTED TO:- SUBMITTED BY:-
PROF.GURDEEPAK SINGH. AKASHDEEP SINGH RIAT
MBA-1
Good Solid Attempt!
ReplyDelete